Department of Pediatrics
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Ph.D., 1991, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center
Telephone: (848) 445-9833
Fax: (732) 235-4466

Xiang Laboratory Site

Molecular basis of neurogenesis, retinal and spinal cord development

The research interests of my laboratory center on understanding the molecular events that lead to the determination, differentiation and survival of highly specialized sensory neurons and cells. The mammalian sensory system carries external and internal sensory information to the central nervous system, where it is processed to coordinate motor responses. The establishment of these sensory circuits in the adult depends critically on the generation of distinct neuronal types and sensory receptors at proper times and positions during embryogenesis as well as on their maintenance throughout life. Despite the importance of sensory neurons and cells, however, the molecular principle underlying their formation and survival still remains poorly understood. My laboratory employs a variety of molecular, genetic and bioinformatic approaches to identify and study transcription factors and signaling molecules that are required for programming development of the retina, inner ear, spinal cord, and other CNS areas. A major focus of our work is to develop knockout and transgenic animal models to study roles of these regulatory genes during normal sensorineural development, as well as to elucidate how mutations in these genes may cause sensorineural disorders such as blindness and deafness.

Our laboratory utilizes two general molecular genetic approaches to understand the biological roles that a regulatory gene plays during vertebrate neurogenesis. One is a loss-of-function approach involving targeted gene disruption in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells to produce mice deficient for a particular gene. The other is a gain-of-function approach involving retrovirus- or plasmid-mediated overexpression of a particular gene in the chick and mouse embryonic tissues. These complementary approaches coupled with bioinformatic analysis have allowed us to identify a number of regulatory factors that are required for fate commitment, differentiation and/or survival of various sensory neurons and cells. For instance, targeted deletion of the winged helix/forkhead transcription factor gene Foxn4 largely eliminates amacrine neurons and completely abolishes horizontal cells in the retina, while misexpressed Foxn4 strongly promotes an amacrine cell fate, indicating that Foxn4 is both necessary and sufficient for commitment to the amacrine cell fate, and is non-redundantly required for competence acquisition for the genesis of horizontal cells. In the spinal cord, loss of Foxn4 function eliminates V2b interneurons and causes a fate-switch to V2a interneurons while overexpression of Foxn4 promotes the V2b fate. We further demonstrate that Foxn4 specifies the V2b fate by regulating the Dll4/Notch1 signaling pathway. Nr4a2 is an orphan nuclear receptor expressed in a subset of postmitotic GABAergic amacrine cells and their precursors during retinogenesis. Its targeted inactivation results in the loss of a subpopulation of GABAergic amacrine neurons whereas misexpressed Nr4a2 promotes GABAergic amacrine cell differentiation, suggesting that Nr4a2 is both necessary and sufficient to confer amacrine precursors with a GABAergic phenotype. These and other similar studies should provide a framework for understanding the regulatory gene network that governs the specification and differentiation of diverse neuronal types and subtypes in the mammalian nervous system.

Figure 1. Effect of targeted Foxn4 deletion on the formation of different retinal cell types. (A-F) Retinal sections from Foxn4+/+ and Foxn4lacZ/lacZ mice were immunostained with the indicated antibodies. Foxn4 inactivation results in a dramatic decrease of amacrine cells immunoreactive for syntaxin, a complete absence of horizontal cells immunoreactive for Lim1 (arrows), and a significant increase in photoreceptors immunoreactive for recoverin. (G) Schematic illustration of the retinal phenotype in Foxn4 null mice.

Selected Publications

Jiang H, Xiang M. (2009) Subtype specification of GABAergic amacrine cells by the orphan nuclear receptor Nr4a2/Nurr1. J Neurosci 29:10449-10459

Qiu F, Jiang H, Xiang M. (2008) A comprehensive negative regulatory program controlled by Brn3b to ensure ganglion cell specification from multipotential retinal precursors. J Neurosci 28:3392-3403

Chellappa R, Li S, Pauley S, Jahan I, Jin K, Xiang M. (2008) Barhl1 regulatory sequences required for cell-specific gene expression and autoregulation in the inner ear and central nervous system. Mol Cell Biol 28:1905-1914

Fujitani Y, Fujitani S, Luo H, Qiu F, Burlison J, Long Q, Kawaguchi Y, Edlund H, MacDonald RJ, Furukawa T, Fujikado T, Magnuson MA, Xiang M, Wright CV. (2006) Ptf1a determines horizontal and amacrine cell fates during mouse retinal development. Development 133:4439-4450

Li S, Misra K, Matise MP, Xiang M. (2005) Foxn4 acts synergistically with Mash1 to specify subtype identity of V2 interneurons in the spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10688-10693

Li S, Mo Z, Yang X, Price SM, Shen MM, Xiang M. (2004) Foxn4 controls the genesis of amacrine and horizontal cells by retinal progenitors. Neuron 43:795-807